Julian’s Weblog

Random thoughts and jottings

London Airports expansion

We are at a time when airlines are downsizing and mothballing aircraft in order to cut costs, the cost of aviation fuel has reached a record high, is set to go higher and threatening to close down many smaller airlines altogether. Add to that the increase in food prices and the cost of living and the reduced availability of credit which will, inevitably, translate into less people who can afford to travel by air.

In the midst of all this the UK’s elected ‘leaders’ seem determined to move ahead with a ridiculous project costing billions of pounds of taxpayers money that not only destroys whole townships and the environment surrounding them but wrecks the lives of tens of thousands of citizens.

What planet do these people come from?

There is simply no need to expand Gatwick, Stansted or Heathrow. Just better utilise the airports that already surround London.

Think about Heathrow and look at this picture. (Note: To increase the size of the picture right click on it and select View Image)

Northolt Airport

Image courtesy of Google Earth

This is Northolt Airport which is just 5.7 miles north of Heathrow with a 1,684 metre (5,500 feet) 46 metre wide asphalt runway. It is easily accessible. The A40 road runs along its southern fence and the Central Line (part of the London Underground network) passes close to its eastern fence.

Why not make Northolt part of London Heathrow and use it for movements by B737, A320 and MD80 (and smaller) aircraft currently using Heathrow itself? Let Heathrow then concentrate on B777/A330/MD11 (and larger) aircraft movements. We are talking about up to 200 movements a day that could be taken away from Heathrow to ease the congestion.

Northolt will require a terminal building and multi-story car parking (there is plenty of space on the south side as you can see from the picture) and an underground link to the Piccadilly Line that will allow speedy transfer of passengers from Northolt to the various terminals at Heathrow.

That’s going to cost a whole lot less than the present suggestion and will probably remove any necessity for an expansion at Heathrow forever.

Look at this picture.

Image courtesy of Google Earth

This is a map of the biggest airports that ring London today. They’re all active and they’ve been there for years and most of them are totally under-utilised.

In the same way that I have suggested for Heathrow, Gatwick could hive off smaller traffic to Biggin Hill whilst Luton and Stansted could spread their operations by adding Benson (to the west) and Southend (to the East) thereby creating an arc of four airports north of London.

And look at Farnborough just to the south west of Heathrow. It has a 2,380 metre runway – long enough for the biggest aircraft. This airport is ideally situated for passengers coming up from the West Country.

What London DOES need is fast, comfortable rail links between all these inner airports. That is where the taxpayers money should be spent.

I have left London City Airport out of this because its primary purpose is to support the City of London business houses that need fast access into the European capitals. It is not a long-haul, tourist travel facility.

Finally, look at what is available regionally.

  • East – Manston
  • South – Bournemouth and Southampton
  • West – Exeter, Bristol and Newquay
  • South Wales – Cardiff
  • The Midlands – Birmingham.
  • The North – Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds/Bradford.
  • Scotland – Glasgow and Edinburgh.

There is more than enough existing airport capacity to cover the nation’s needs for the foreseeable future.

There is certainly no need to expand anything.

June 2, 2008 - Posted by Julian Hustwitt | airport, flying, travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

7 Comments »

  1. hi

    Google Alerts brought me to this Website and i would like
    to Comment on Farnborough . Farnborough is Londons Biz airport
    and is operating at very near capacity and Subject to very
    strict local planning issues. Expansion plans are being made
    at present to increase total allowed movements but this could
    take Years. TAG Aviation clearly state that Farnborough will
    never allow CHARTER -SHEDULED-FRIEGHT operations .Airctaft size is also resticted and largest Aircraft seen at present
    are the BOEING BBJ2 and AIRBUS A319\320 Biz varients.
    This is only Differed for the SBAC Airshow. Operating hours
    are very strictly controlled and there seems no room for expansion of those. All in all Farnborough Is a Very busy
    place up to 150 movements per day of BIZ jets world wide

    Tony (farnborough Resident)

    Comment by Tony | June 2, 2008 | Reply

  2. Interesting views on Farnborough Airport, but Tony is right – it is currently just for business aviation. For more information, have a look at:

    http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2024928_farnborough_airport

    Comment by Pete | June 3, 2008 | Reply

  3. And more news on London’s Airports RAF Northolt is to Allow some weekend Biz flights but said to be 15 Per Day and very
    strict rules on those. Farnborough TAG aviation New Hotel
    on the A325 is due to open in time For the Airshow 14th to 20 July first if 3 planned hotels around the Area . And loads of
    new Houses and flats are to be built on disused airfield land
    close to the A325 So despite the said protests about the airfield there is great demand to live here .The new town centre is being built with Shops houses cinema and more so
    Farnborough is it seems the place to live and work in despite the anti everything brigade saying the airfield blights the area .There is very little public Support for there views and most people do not care about the airfield it causes no disturbance or very little to there lives .

    Tony (farnborough)
    resident and Aviation Enthusiast

    Comment by Tony | June 15, 2008 | Reply

  4. The idea of a runway north of the A4 at London Airport, as Heathrow then was, was considered before 1952. There was an article about it in either “Flight” or “The Aeroplane” about that time. I thought that it would have been easy then for Northolt to be connected to LAP by a rail link. The Piccadilly line to Uxbridge finished just to the north of the GWR station which was the terminus of the rail link from West Drayton. From there to Heathrow would have been simple but of course the Uxbridge/West Drayton line was discontinued and has since been covered with housing. Missed opportunities.

    But think of the complaints you would get now if Northolt is used for real commercial flights, let alone bizjets and military traffic. A definite “no-go”.

    Comment by Mike Read | July 11, 2008 | Reply

  5. HI

    Blackbushe (hartford bridge Flats)has been suggested as could
    have Filled the Heathrow problem of Runway use . But when it closed because of Heathrow And Gatwick expanding there was the
    Almighty Rush to dig up the Runways just like Greenham common
    Thankfully part was Saved and bought by Douggie Arnold its now
    very busy GA Airfield owned by British car auctions and has
    Servicing for many types. It also like every AIRPORT a Very
    Vocal anti flying lobby and a commons group who still maintain
    they have a right to graze sheep on the airfield as YATELY COMMON Mind you driving down past there look out for DEER
    Jumping about .

    Comment by Tony | July 13, 2008 | Reply

  6. [...] seems like a better idea. London Airports expansion Any chance one of our great and glorious politico’s might understand?? And pigs might [...]

    Pingback by Heathrow 3rd Runway Given Go-Ahead Controversially - Page 3 - PPRuNe Forums | January 15, 2009 | Reply

  7. This idea has been mooted several times before and, personally, I think it the most sensible. A high speed rail link between the two – that also takes baggage in aircraft containers a bit like the Chunnel trains take trucks? Yes that all makes sense.

    It won’t happen.

    1) Do you think the military will give this up? They will remind the PM about it’s use for the Royal Flight (and that includes the PM) and ‘national security’

    2) If you think the folks of Sipson know how to complain, have you any idea how the folks in the well to do houses of Ruislip and Northwood (‘Metroland’) will complain?

    Nope, not gonna happen.

    Comment by Simon nAllen | January 16, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment